July 9, 2012
Warning: This post contains descriptions of historic practices of human sacrifice and cannibalism which may be disturbing to some readers.
Warning: This post contains descriptions of historic practices of human sacrifice and cannibalism which may be disturbing to some readers.
Haka platform (tohua) at Hikokua |
I gave an account of walking over the mountain from Anaho
Bay to the village of Hatiheu in the previous post. Our intention was to visit
some of the archaeological sites in the valley. Although they were within
walking distance, and given a few directions we could have visited them on our
own, we were hoping to find a local guide to give us more insight into what we
were seeing. Hatiheu is linked to the rest of the island by road, and we knew
tour groups from Taiohae routinely came to see the ruins. We didn’t know if we
could hook up with one of these tours in Hatiheu or find a separate tour.
After asking around, we were directed to one of the houses
near the church, where we found Hiohka---I'm not sure if I've spelled that correctly---whose French name is Alphonse. The locals call him “Ru-ah,” but we
learned that this was actually a hated nickname. We were told he did tours of
the sites. Hiohka was tired and was doing his laundry; he clearly didn’t
really feel like doing a tour that day. But when he heard we had walked to
Hatiheu from Anaho Bay, he invited us in, and after thinking about it for
awhile, he decided to take us. When asked the price for his time, he said he
would take us for free. We were caught off guard. The tours out of Atuona and
Taiohae were given for cash, and we assumed that would be the case here. It
turns out that (in my opinion), the individual we were dealing with in this
case would have responded better to a meaningful gift (something personal) in
trade in exchange for his time. In the end, Hiohka did accept some cash from us---but only to get out of a meal
we offered to buy him at the restaurant in exchange for the tour. He could tell
it would be difficult for us to accept the tour without giving something in exchange,
so he took the cash in order to get back to doing his laundry!
Hiohka took us to
two archaeological sites within walking distance of the village: tohua Hikokua and tohua Kamuihei, both
gathering grounds containing meae, or platforms where human sacrifice was
performed. He told us there were actually five or six archaeological sites in
the valley.
We were impressed by the sheer size of the sites at Hikokua
and Kamuihei, both much larger than the site we had previously visited at
Puamau on Hiva Oa. Hiohka toured us
around Hikokua first, identifying various things we were seeing. While pointing
out places used for sleeping, we believed he sometimes used the term “sleeping”
for actual sleeping and other times for a final resting place, as in coffin.
These were some of the places identified for sleeping that we understood to be tombs where the remains of chiefs were located:
A barely visible rectangular pit in the platform behind the tall stones |
Five rectangular spaces outlined in lava boulders |
We learned that the same platforms were often used for both human sacrifice and dancing, indicating the highly ritualized nature of human sacrifice in ancient Marquesan culture.
Front wall of haka platform |
Detail of ancient tiki in wall of haka platform |
Hiohka related to me a legend about how the haka dance was born. Haka is a Polynesian dance form practiced in the Marquesas that is similar to hulu in Hawaii. Keep in mind that this legend was told to someone (me) with very little Marquesan/French language skills by someone with very little English language skill. But as I understood it, the legend went something like this: A son was born to a woman from Hiva Oa and a man from Hatiheu (on Nuku Hiva.) The woman took her son to Hiva Oa and raised him there. After a time, the son wanted to find his father, so they returned to Hatiheu. There, they were treated as outsiders and captured by the valley’s tribe. They were imprisoned in this pit (now collapsed), awaiting sacrifice.
Prison in which victims intended for sacrifice were held |
Around this time, the father also began thinking about his son and went to seek him out. He found his family held captive in the pit.
At this time, the father performed a haka dance so
compelling and distracting that all eyes were on his dance. When the captors’
attention returned to the prisoners in the pit, they were gone. (The story was a little
vague about whether the family escaped or whether a third party rescued them while
the father was distracting their captors.)
Hiohka also told me that as a result of this legend, haka is performed by different genders on Hiva Oa and in Hatiehu (Nuku Hiva); however, I could not find any information to corroborate this. It may have once been true but does not appear to be true today, as members of both sexes participate in some form of haka dance on both islands.
At Hikokua, we also saw this chilling sculpture of a chief holding an infant and a weapon. It is not clear to me if he is holding an ‘u’u---ancient club weapon used for combat---or one of the neck-breaking devices described later in this post. (Our guide said it was an 'u'u, but I have seen it recorded elsewhere as the latter.) When I asked if it was typical to sacrifice babies, our guide responded that the chief in question was a “bad chief,” indicating a level of cruelty that was perhaps not typical.
We moved on to Kamuihei. This site had been partially
reconstructed when it hosted a Marquesan arts festival. Here, we saw these
reconstructed lean-to-type shelters of pandanus walls and roofs, which were used as sleeping platforms.
Coconut trees were employed to make ladders to access the raised sleeping platforms |
Some of the artwork on the site was not Marquesan, but had been created during the arts festival. For example, this basket of skulls (depicting the Marquesan custom of keeping the skulls of both enemies and ancestors) was created by an artist from Rapa Nui.
Dominating the site at Kamuihei was an ancient banyan tree,
which our guide estimated to be seven-hundred years old.
Testimonial: Tree of sorrow |
A picture does not do justice to the girth of the tree, which was almost 50 feet in diameter. If trees could speak, this ancient tree would have a lot to say because it witnessed untold suffering. Here, at the edge of the banyan roots, was another pit in which people were imprisoned prior to being sacrificed.
This pit was much deeper than the one at Hikokua.
Our guide
told us that the skulls of sacrificed victims were also thrown into the pit,
and that the archaeological expedition that cleared the site recovered many
skull caps from the pit. Imagine what it felt like to be a prisoner in that
dark pit, about to be killed, cooked, and eaten, and seeing the skulls of
former victims surrounding you: terrifying.
Perhaps the ancient tree lives on so the stories
of those victims are not lost.
To keep things in perspective, however, I must
relate the story our friend Henri told us when we returned to Taiohae and heard we visited Hatiheu. He said
he could take us to a place where tens of thousands of skulls could be found, those of Marquesans whose bodies were burned in mass graves after they died from diseases brought to the islands by Europeans. In an earlier post (Initial Impressions of French Polynesia), I mentioned that the population of the Marquesans had declined from an estimated 20,000 to around 8,000. It turns out that original figure was a gross underestimate, and I have since corrected it. Estimates of the Marquesan population at the time of first European contact range from 60,000 to 80,000 (by the Europeans) to over 100,000 (by the Marquesans.) The old story, witnessed in the Americas, in which native tribes were decimated by diseases brought through European contact, played itself out in the Marquesas as well. While their own practices of human sacrifice and cannibalism affected relatively few victims, the impact of European diseases on the Marquesans had a much larger impact.
It is also important to note that Marquesans did not always practice human sacrifice and cannibalism. Their early history in the islands shows no evidence of this. A poster outside the archaeological museum at Hatiheu indicated that the large-scale tohua and meae were constructed during the 1600's and 1700's---and although cannibalism persisted on some islands until the early 1900's, it no longer exists today. When you put that in perspective with the arrival of the Marquesans on these islands---between 100 AD and 300 AD (estimates also vary)--it is a relatively short time period.
It is also important to note that Marquesans did not always practice human sacrifice and cannibalism. Their early history in the islands shows no evidence of this. A poster outside the archaeological museum at Hatiheu indicated that the large-scale tohua and meae were constructed during the 1600's and 1700's---and although cannibalism persisted on some islands until the early 1900's, it no longer exists today. When you put that in perspective with the arrival of the Marquesans on these islands---between 100 AD and 300 AD (estimates also vary)--it is a relatively short time period.
At Kamuihei, we gained an appreciation for the full scale of
the archaeological sites and the activities held there. We did not even see the
entire site, Hiohka told us it
extended ever further back into the valley. As we mentioned in the post on
Puamau, the meae were constructed in levels, in a series of plaforms or
terraces.
Only the priests had access to some levels, which were “tapu” (or taboo) to normal people. This higher platform was relegated only to chiefs, who would watch the spectacle of human sacrifice on the lower platform below.
Two photos showing terraced construction of meae |
Only the priests had access to some levels, which were “tapu” (or taboo) to normal people. This higher platform was relegated only to chiefs, who would watch the spectacle of human sacrifice on the lower platform below.
The speckled rocks indicate the area where the chiefs would sit |
Eating table on chiefs' terrace |
Here was an area of the site in which human sacrifice occurred. This level was directly below the level on which the chiefs were seated. Thousands of spectators gathered in the lower level.
The stone area near center is where victims were sacrificed |
The site is surrounded by mape trees, and our guide demonstrated how the mape tree was used to gather the tribe (an alternative to blowing on a conch shell). When a rock is pounded against the base of a mape tree, it results in a large, hollow bass tone.
Mape tree |
At large tohua, like Kamuihei, there are actually sub-sites
within the site, so there may be more than one area where these activities take
place.
Thousands of people would gather to watch the spectacle.
Patrick remarked that the level of cruelty involved in that reminded him of the
Romans, who would gather to watch people being fed to the lions as if it was a sporting event. Our guide did
not tell us about it, but we heard from others who had visited the site, that
victims of human sacrifice were subjected to some level of torture before
sacrifice. These victims were primarily enemies from rival tribes, and
intertribal warfare was common in the Marquesas during the time period when
cannibalism was practiced.
If a victim was not already dead at the time of sacrifice, the head of the victim was cut off. At the Te Henua Enana museum, we saw a stone that the priest was said to place on the head of the intended victim. The stone was believed to absorb the enemy's power and mana (a sort of accumulated spiritual wealth, something like karma.) At the same museum, we also saw a tool that was said to be used to break the neck of a victim before sacrifice, so apparently more than one method was used to kill victims intended for sacrifice.
If a victim was not already dead at the time of sacrifice, the head of the victim was cut off. At the Te Henua Enana museum, we saw a stone that the priest was said to place on the head of the intended victim. The stone was believed to absorb the enemy's power and mana (a sort of accumulated spiritual wealth, something like karma.) At the same museum, we also saw a tool that was said to be used to break the neck of a victim before sacrifice, so apparently more than one method was used to kill victims intended for sacrifice.
I believe (but don’t know for sure) that human flesh was cooked in earth ovens like roasted pigs are today; in fact, the Marquesan term for human flesh was “long pig.” However, there were also shallow pits on the sites that may have been used for cooking other dishes or fermenting breadfruit.
Shallow pit used for food preparation |
It was difficult to tell tombs, ovens, and areas used for cold storage (like our root cellars) from each other, and I think their location in the sites was one of the primary indicators of their use.
Tomb (grass clippings due to maintenance being performed on site) |
Former "root cellar" for cold storage |
Here is a sharpening stone that was present on the site.
Along with human sacrifice, other rituals and ceremonies took place at the meae. We were finally told that the purpose of the rock mortars we had been seeing everywhere was not just to hold tattoo ink but to grind medicinal compounds as well.
Hiohka also showed us the Marquesan nut used to make tattoo ink.
This nut was burned to create soot, and its ashes mixed with water or oil to make tattoo ink |
Here is a second site used for human sacrifice at Kamuihei. Here, the large rock was used to decapitate the victim. Again, the platform on which the rock rests was also used for ritualized dancing connected with the sacrifice.
We learned that the wide-eyes we had first seen on Smiling
Tiki were called matas. I had to take
this picture upside down because the rocks on which the petroglyph was
originally carved had been disturbed.
There were also some very large scale scenes carved on
boulders.
I found the Marquesan petroglyphs easier to relate to than
some highly symbolized petroglyphs I’ve seen from other cultures. In this case, the symbol was very similar to the creature or object it represented in real life. Here is another large-scale petroglyph:
The dominant figure in the scene is the large fish or mahi mahi near the top.
Here is a detail of an outrigger canoe or pirogue.
Here is a detail of an outrigger canoe or pirogue.
The eight circular figures represent the eight rowers in the canoe. In the top right corner, you can see part of a sea turtle or honu (its head is not shown in the photo.)
As we toured the two sites, I noticed Hiohka displaying stewardship. He picked up a piece of
trash at the first site, a beer can probably left behind by local youth. From time to time, he
would also stop and pull up young saplings that had sprouted between the stones in
the meae at Kamuihei. As we neared the end of our tour, we approached a platform where
three women were working, weeding between the stones in the platform. Hiohka introduced one of the women to
me as his sister. I got the impression that Hiohka’s family maintained this particular site. I don’t know for
sure, but I inferred that maintaining their cultural legacy is a
volunteer effort on the part of the Marquesans and that none of the French
governmental budget is allocated for this.
On the way back to the village, Hiohka indicated an area where there was an even larger site than
the one at Kamuihei. He explained that the site used to be maintained by the
school children, but since there are now fewer school aged youth in the village,
it is no longer maintained and the jungle has grown back over it.
Marquesan Pride |
Our visit to the archaeological sites in Hatiehu was both
sobering and illuminating. Even with the language barrier, I was really happy
we’d elected to go with a guide. We got much more out of the experience than we
would have on our own.
Great pictures you guys. A very good read, enjoyed another one your wonderful delightful adventures.
ReplyDelete